Read Online
Summary
In this report, the Education Review Office (ERO) has identified examples of good practice in teaching and learning in kura kaupapa Māori that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua. In this report ‘kura’ is used to refer to these kura kaupapa Māori.
Te Aho Matua, as defined in the English version of the guiding document, is “the means by which the special nature of kura can be clearly identified from mainstream schools.” It “provides the basis from which the curriculum planning and design can evolve,” and is divided into six wāhanga:
- Te Ira Tangata;
- Te Reo;
- Ngā Iwi;
- Te Ao;
- Āhuatanga Ako; and
- Te Tino Uaratanga.
ERO envisages that this report will be useful to kura kaupapa Māori in highlighting good practice, and possible areas for future development or improvement. Some of the practices that have proved effective for students in Te Aho Matua kura may also be of interest to whānau of other kura.
Te Aho Matua evaluation criteria have provided a framework for reporting this good practice.
In this report, the Education Review Office (ERO) has identified examples of good practice in teaching and learning in kura kaupapa Māori that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua. In this report ‘kura’ is used to refer to these kura kaupapa Māori.
Te Aho Matua, as defined in the English version of the guiding document, is “the means by which the special nature of kura can be clearly identified from mainstream schools.” It “provides the basis from which the curriculum planning and design can evolve,” and is divided into six wāhanga:
- Te Ira Tangata;
- Te Reo;
- Ngā Iwi;
- Te Ao;
- Āhuatanga Ako; and
- Te Tino Uaratanga.
ERO envisages that this report will be useful to kura kaupapa Māori in highlighting good practice, and possible areas for future development or improvement. Some of the practices that have proved effective for students in Te Aho Matua kura may also be of interest to whānau of other kura.
Te Aho Matua evaluation criteria have provided a framework for reporting this good practice.
Introduction
In this report, the Education Review Office (ERO) has identified examples of good practice in teaching and learning in kura kaupapa Māori that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua. In this report ‘kura’ is used to refer to these kura kaupapa Māori.
Te Aho Matua, as defined in the English version of the guiding document, is “the means by which the special nature of kura can be clearly identified from mainstream schools.” It “provides the basis from which the curriculum planning and design can evolve,” and is divided into six wāhanga:
- Te Ira Tangata;
- Te Reo;
- Ngā Iwi;
- Te Ao;
- Āhuatanga Ako; and
- Te Tino Uaratanga.
ERO envisages that this report will be useful to kura kaupapa Māori in highlighting good practice, and possible areas for future development or improvement. Some of the practices that have proved effective for students in Te Aho Matua kura may also be of interest to whānau of other kura.
Te Aho Matua evaluation criteria have provided a framework for reporting this good practice.
In this report, the Education Review Office (ERO) has identified examples of good practice in teaching and learning in kura kaupapa Māori that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua. In this report ‘kura’ is used to refer to these kura kaupapa Māori.
Te Aho Matua, as defined in the English version of the guiding document, is “the means by which the special nature of kura can be clearly identified from mainstream schools.” It “provides the basis from which the curriculum planning and design can evolve,” and is divided into six wāhanga:
- Te Ira Tangata;
- Te Reo;
- Ngā Iwi;
- Te Ao;
- Āhuatanga Ako; and
- Te Tino Uaratanga.
ERO envisages that this report will be useful to kura kaupapa Māori in highlighting good practice, and possible areas for future development or improvement. Some of the practices that have proved effective for students in Te Aho Matua kura may also be of interest to whānau of other kura.
Te Aho Matua evaluation criteria have provided a framework for reporting this good practice.
Methodology
Methodology Refinements
Review teams made up of ERO reviewers and a representative from Te Rūnanga Nui o Ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori o Aotearoa undertake the reviews of kura. The ERO review officers and the kaitiaki of Te Aho Matua bring together their relevant experience and expertise in these evaluations.
Evaluation criteria that reflect the principles of Te Aho Matua have been used as part of ERO standard procedures for reviewing kura that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua. Kura whānau can also use these to guide their own internal review.
The information for this report comes from kura review reports and evidential files. These reviews were carried out using the methodology designed by a combined working party in September 2000.1
Evaluation findings and review report comments from reviews carried out between 2001 to 2006 were collated under each of the six wāhanga. As part of its own self review, ERO met with Te Rūnanga Nui to share the collated information. These meetings were designed to allow the kaitiaki of Te Aho Matua and ERO to discuss trends and patterns emerging in kura.
ERO and Te Rūnanga Nui agreed that the information gathered gave a broad picture of what was happening in Te Aho Matua kura at the time. It also gave a general insight into the extent to which the principles of Te Aho Matua guided the choices, plans and decisions whānau made about their children’s education.
ERO used this information to consider possible refinements to the review methodology that would increase the quality and usefulness of information collected, and clarify the context for evaluative judgements and evaluation practice. This revised methodology, refined by a second working party,2 is currently being used in reviews of Te Aho Matua kura.
ERO has recently printed two documents for the review of Te Aho Matua kura:
- A Framework for the Reviews and Evaluations of Te Aho Matua Kura Kaupapa Māori
- Indicators for the Reviews and Evaluations of Te Aho Matua Kura Kaupapa Māori.
These are also available under Review Process on ERO’s website – www.ero.govt.nz.
Identifying key areas of good practice
In this report, ERO has collated the findings under each wāhanga, identifying in many of the kura some practices that enhance outcomes for students.
The following principles underpin review methodology:
- external review is based on self review by kura whānau;
- the process of the review of kura is based on dialogue;
- evaluative criteria are based on the principles of Te Aho Matua;
- there is an understanding of the nature of the Māori language (in the kura) in the context of Māori efforts to revitalise and regenerate the Māori language; and
- there is an understanding that the curriculum development process occurs in the context of kura efforts to re-establish mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) and tikanga Māori.
While practice differed among the kura, each kura used programmes that were appropriate for their own students, met the aspirations of their whānau, and drew on the strengths of kaiako, and kura whānau.
This report presents an overview of good practice demonstrated in 56 kura reviewed by ERO during 2001 to 2006.
Methodology Refinements
Review teams made up of ERO reviewers and a representative from Te Rūnanga Nui o Ngā Kura Kaupapa Māori o Aotearoa undertake the reviews of kura. The ERO review officers and the kaitiaki of Te Aho Matua bring together their relevant experience and expertise in these evaluations.
Evaluation criteria that reflect the principles of Te Aho Matua have been used as part of ERO standard procedures for reviewing kura that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua. Kura whānau can also use these to guide their own internal review.
The information for this report comes from kura review reports and evidential files. These reviews were carried out using the methodology designed by a combined working party in September 2000.1
Evaluation findings and review report comments from reviews carried out between 2001 to 2006 were collated under each of the six wāhanga. As part of its own self review, ERO met with Te Rūnanga Nui to share the collated information. These meetings were designed to allow the kaitiaki of Te Aho Matua and ERO to discuss trends and patterns emerging in kura.
ERO and Te Rūnanga Nui agreed that the information gathered gave a broad picture of what was happening in Te Aho Matua kura at the time. It also gave a general insight into the extent to which the principles of Te Aho Matua guided the choices, plans and decisions whānau made about their children’s education.
ERO used this information to consider possible refinements to the review methodology that would increase the quality and usefulness of information collected, and clarify the context for evaluative judgements and evaluation practice. This revised methodology, refined by a second working party,2 is currently being used in reviews of Te Aho Matua kura.
ERO has recently printed two documents for the review of Te Aho Matua kura:
- A Framework for the Reviews and Evaluations of Te Aho Matua Kura Kaupapa Māori
- Indicators for the Reviews and Evaluations of Te Aho Matua Kura Kaupapa Māori.
These are also available under Review Process on ERO’s website – www.ero.govt.nz.
Identifying key areas of good practice
In this report, ERO has collated the findings under each wāhanga, identifying in many of the kura some practices that enhance outcomes for students.
The following principles underpin review methodology:
- external review is based on self review by kura whānau;
- the process of the review of kura is based on dialogue;
- evaluative criteria are based on the principles of Te Aho Matua;
- there is an understanding of the nature of the Māori language (in the kura) in the context of Māori efforts to revitalise and regenerate the Māori language; and
- there is an understanding that the curriculum development process occurs in the context of kura efforts to re-establish mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) and tikanga Māori.
While practice differed among the kura, each kura used programmes that were appropriate for their own students, met the aspirations of their whānau, and drew on the strengths of kaiako, and kura whānau.
This report presents an overview of good practice demonstrated in 56 kura reviewed by ERO during 2001 to 2006.
Good Practice in Te Aho Matua Kura Kaupapa Māori
Conclusion
This report has outlined key aspects of good practice in 56 kura that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua collated under the six wāhanga:
- Te Ira Tangata;
- Te Reo;
- Ngā Iwi;
- Te Ao;
- Āhuatanga Ako; and
- Te Tino Uaratanga.
Although the practices described are many and varied, there were common characteristics of good practice. Specifically, these included:
- kura whānau establishing a sound knowledge of Te Aho Matua, and developing a shared understanding of the importance of its practical implication in the kura;
- the high expectations of kura whānau for student success in learning, in both te reo Māori and English, that guide the future direction of programmes, interactions, experiences and practice;
- kura whānau remaining focused on delivering a high quality, holistic education that reinforces and acknowledges the importance of establishing a strong sense of identity in each student;
- kura whānau reviewing kura practice and programme effectiveness in light of analysed achievement information;
- whānau working together, sharing strengths and expertise to enhance learning opportunities and experiences for students;
- kaiako making effective use of assessment information to plan and adapt their teaching, thereby working to address the needs of individual students;
- kaiako sharing assessment information with students so they gain greater understanding of their own learning; and
- reflective kaiako actively seeking information on how to improve their teaching, refine learning programmes, and monitor the practices in their kura to enhance student performance, achievement and outcomes.
While every kura will have a different approach to implementing good practice, this report may help kura as they think about ways to improve outcomes for their students.
1. A Ministerial Working Party, comprising members from ERO, the Ministry of Education and the Rūnanga Nui, was established in September 2000 to develop a review methodology for kura kaupapa Māori that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua.
2. During 2006 representatives from Te Rūnanga Nui, the Ministry of Education and ERO worked together to review and further develop the design and implementation of the methodology for Te Aho Matua kura kaupapa Māori. The revised methodology was being trialled in kura at the time of this report.
This report has outlined key aspects of good practice in 56 kura that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua collated under the six wāhanga:
- Te Ira Tangata;
- Te Reo;
- Ngā Iwi;
- Te Ao;
- Āhuatanga Ako; and
- Te Tino Uaratanga.
Although the practices described are many and varied, there were common characteristics of good practice. Specifically, these included:
- kura whānau establishing a sound knowledge of Te Aho Matua, and developing a shared understanding of the importance of its practical implication in the kura;
- the high expectations of kura whānau for student success in learning, in both te reo Māori and English, that guide the future direction of programmes, interactions, experiences and practice;
- kura whānau remaining focused on delivering a high quality, holistic education that reinforces and acknowledges the importance of establishing a strong sense of identity in each student;
- kura whānau reviewing kura practice and programme effectiveness in light of analysed achievement information;
- whānau working together, sharing strengths and expertise to enhance learning opportunities and experiences for students;
- kaiako making effective use of assessment information to plan and adapt their teaching, thereby working to address the needs of individual students;
- kaiako sharing assessment information with students so they gain greater understanding of their own learning; and
- reflective kaiako actively seeking information on how to improve their teaching, refine learning programmes, and monitor the practices in their kura to enhance student performance, achievement and outcomes.
While every kura will have a different approach to implementing good practice, this report may help kura as they think about ways to improve outcomes for their students.
1. A Ministerial Working Party, comprising members from ERO, the Ministry of Education and the Rūnanga Nui, was established in September 2000 to develop a review methodology for kura kaupapa Māori that operate in accordance with Te Aho Matua.
2. During 2006 representatives from Te Rūnanga Nui, the Ministry of Education and ERO worked together to review and further develop the design and implementation of the methodology for Te Aho Matua kura kaupapa Māori. The revised methodology was being trialled in kura at the time of this report.